At a glance — how these 4 alternatives compare
Our read on each project's adoption, maintenance activity and commercial-use risk, derived from GitHub signals and SPDX license terms rather than star count alone. Sorted by stars. How we score.
| Project | Adoption | Maintenance | Commercial use |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★ 57,241 · PHP | Flagship | Active | Low risk Embed in a proprietary product with no copyleft obligation |
| ★ 31,950 · Shell | Flagship | Active | Low risk Embed in a proprietary product with no copyleft obligation |
| ★ 15,065 · TypeScript | Mainstream | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
| ★ 530 · Rust | Niche | Active | Low risk Embed in a proprietary product with no copyleft obligation |
The alternatives
coolify
An open-source, self-hostable PaaS alternative to Vercel, Heroku & Netlify that lets you easily deploy static sites, databases, full-stack applications and 280+ one-click services on your own servers.
coollabsio/coolify Updated 2026-06-20 dokku
A docker-powered PaaS that helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications
dokku/dokku Updated 2026-06-19 caprover
Scalable PaaS (automated Docker+nginx) - aka Heroku on Steroids
caprover/caprover Updated 2026-05-18 cli
Railway CLI
railwayapp/cli Updated 2026-04-22 Editor's take
Yusuke Morinaga · last revisited
A self-hosted PaaS gives you back the git-push magic — but you become the platform team.
The thing people loved about Heroku was never the compute. It was that
git push heroku main turned source code into a running, TLS-terminated,
auto-restarting app with a managed Postgres one command away, and nobody had
to be the ops person. The projects below can all give you the first part. The
part they cannot give you is the second: when you self-host a PaaS, you are
the platform team now. That trade — predictable cheap infrastructure in
exchange for owning the substrate — is the whole decision.
Coolify — the closest thing to “Heroku on your own VPS”
Coolify (55.6k stars, PHP, Apache-2.0) is where I would start, and it is the most complete of the four. Git-push (or Git-webhook) deploys, automatic Let’s Encrypt SSL, and a one-click catalog of 280+ services — Postgres, Redis, MySQL, and so on — provisioned onto servers you own. Apache-2.0 is a clean license. It is the option that most faithfully recreates the Heroku feeling for a small team: a dashboard, push to deploy, databases a click away. The honest asterisk is that “managed Postgres” here means “Coolify ran a Postgres container for you” — backups, HA, and point-in-time recovery are still your responsibility to configure, not a checkbox SLA the way Heroku Postgres was.
Dokku — the minimalist’s Heroku, literally built on buildpacks
Dokku (31.9k stars, Shell, MIT) is the oldest idea here and still the leanest: it is essentially “Heroku-in-a-box” built directly on Docker and Heroku buildpacks, which means an app that deployed to Heroku will very often deploy to Dokku with minimal changes. MIT licensed. It is a single-host tool at heart (clustering is possible but not its strength), driven by the CLI rather than a polished web UI. Pick Dokku when you want the smallest, most transparent system, you are comfortable on the command line, and one beefy VPS is enough.
CapRover — the GUI-first middle ground
CapRover (15k stars, TypeScript) is the pick if you want a real web UI and
one-click apps but on a Docker Swarm foundation that can grow to multiple
nodes. Its card license reads NOASSERTION (Apache-2.0 in the repo, just not
cleanly detected by GitHub). It sits between Dokku’s CLI minimalism and
Coolify’s broad service catalog. Reasonable choice if you specifically want
Swarm-based multi-node scaling with a GUI.
The Railway CLI is not a self-hosting option — ignore it for this purpose
The fourth entry (Railway’s CLI, 530 stars, Rust, MIT) is the open-source command-line client for Railway’s hosted platform — it is not a self-hostable PaaS you run on your own servers. It is below our star bar and, more importantly, off-topic for “replace Heroku with something I host.” If you liked Heroku and just want another managed PaaS without the ops, Railway (or Render/Fly) is a fair answer — but that is switching SaaS, not self-hosting.
What you are signing up to own
Heroku’s review apps (a fresh environment per pull request) are not a first-class feature in any of these, and its managed-Postgres SLA — automated backups, failover, point-in-time restore, all behind a checkbox — is exactly the part you are taking on yourself. For a small team that wants control and a flat bill, Coolify on a $20–40/month VPS is a genuinely good trade. For a team without anyone willing to be on call for the database, staying on a managed platform is the honest answer.
Comparison notes
Coolify is the most Heroku-comparable self-hosted PaaS, supporting git push deployments, automatic SSL, and a marketplace of one-click services (Postgres, Redis, etc.) running on your own VPS. Dokku is a lighter Docker-based alternative with Heroku buildpack compatibility. CapRover provides a Docker Swarm-based PaaS. The main gaps: Heroku's managed Postgres service with automated backups and HA at a click has no equivalent without cloud provider help in self-hosting. Heroku's review apps (per-pull-request environments) are not replicated by most OSS alternatives. None of the OSS options match Heroku's Salesforce ecosystem integration depth.
Migration tips
- Check if your app uses Heroku Buildpacks — Dokku and Coolify both support Buildpacks for compatible apps
- Export Heroku Postgres databases using pg:backups:capture and download before migrating
- Audit Heroku Add-on usage (SendGrid, Papertrail, New Relic) and configure equivalents in your target platform's services
- Set environment variables in your new platform to match all Heroku Config Vars
- Plan for a DNS cutover window — update DNS from Heroku's custom domain to your new server IP with appropriate TTL preparation
Which alternative should you pick?
We don't believe in a single "best" answer here — the right project depends on your license constraints, team size, and tolerance for early-stage tooling. The 4 projects above each have a distinct profile. Use this decision tree:
- You want the most active community and the lowest risk of abandonment → coolify. 57,241★ — the largest user base in this list, which usually means more StackOverflow answers, more plugins, and more deployment runbooks online.
License & commercial-use notes
For an open-source replacement the license often matters more than any single feature — it decides whether you can modify the project, embed it in a product, or offer it as a hosted service. Here is how the 4 projects on this page break down:
- Permissive (coolify, dokku, cli) — MIT / Apache / BSD / ISC — modify and embed inside a commercial product with no copyleft obligation. The safest bucket for shipping in a proprietary codebase.
- Unverified license (caprover) — GitHub returned no clear SPDX id. Treat as all-rights-reserved until you read the project's LICENSE file directly — do not assume commercial use is permitted.
License fields come from the GitHub API's SPDX classification and can lag a relicense. The repository linked on each card is authoritative — confirm its LICENSE file before any license-sensitive deployment.
Maintenance health of these 4 projects
Of the 4 projects listed, 4 shipped at least one commit in the last 12 months. See how we rank for the full criteria and our self-hosting cost reality check, which apply across every comparison on this site.
Frequently asked questions
How do these 4 alternatives compare on maintenance health?
4 of 4 have shipped a commit in the last 12 months. At least one project here has 5,000+ GitHub stars, which usually correlates with sustained maintainership. Always check the last-pushed date in the cards above and read the latest 5 closed issues — those two signals together catch 80% of abandoned-project cases.
How this page was compiled
- Repository facts (stars, license, language, last commit) come straight from the GitHub public API and are linked on each card as the primary source.
- Editorial analysis is drafted from Heroku's use case and the alternatives' repository metadata, then reviewed by hand.
- Maintenance signal: 4 of 4 projects shipped a commit in the last 12 months as of the latest rebuild (most recent activity: ).
- Last editorial review: by Yusuke Morinaga.
- Spotted an error? Email [email protected] with the page URL (subject prefix
[correction]) — we ship corrections within 14 days.