At a glance — how these 5 alternatives compare
Our read on each project's adoption, maintenance activity and commercial-use risk, derived from GitHub signals and SPDX license terms rather than star count alone. Sorted by stars. How we score.
| Project | Adoption | Maintenance | Commercial use |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★ 63,501 · TypeScript | Flagship | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
| ★ 36,038 · TypeScript | Flagship | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
| ★ 21,365 · TypeScript | Mainstream | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
| ★ 5,123 · Python | Mainstream | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
| ★ 4,705 · Python | Established | Active | Unknown risk No clear SPDX id — treat as all-rights-reserved until verified |
The alternatives
nocodb
🔥 🔥 🔥 A Free & Self-hostable Airtable Alternative
nocodb/nocodb Updated 2026-06-21 directus
The flexible backend for all your projects 🐰 Turn your DB into a headless CMS, admin panels, or apps with a custom UI, instant APIs, auth & more.
directus/directus Updated 2026-06-19 teable
✨ The Next Gen Airtable Alternative: No-Code Postgres
teableio/teable Updated 2026-06-21 baserow
Build databases, automations, apps & agents with AI — no code. Open source platform available on cloud and self-hosted. GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 compliant. Best Airtable alternative.
bram2w/baserow Updated 2026-06-20 baserow
Build databases, automations, apps & agents with AI — no code. Open source platform available on cloud and self-hosted. GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 compliant. Best Airtable alternative.
baserow/baserow Updated 2026-04-22 Editor's take
Yusuke Morinaga · last revisited
Notes from running NocoDB, Baserow, and Teable side-by-side on the same dataset for six weeks.
A useful exercise: I took a real Airtable base of mine (1,400 rows across 8 linked tables, a couple of formula fields, two views per table) and imported it into NocoDB, Baserow, and Teable, the same week, against the same Postgres. Six weeks later, here is what I would not have known from reading the GitHub READMEs.
The one project I did not rebuild for this exercise is Directus. Directus is in the list above and is excellent in its own right, but it is honestly not in the same product category as Airtable — Directus is a “headless CMS over your database” with a spreadsheet-shaped admin, whereas the others are “Airtable-shaped products that happen to use a database”. If your team’s mental model is “spreadsheet first, database second”, Directus will feel weirdly inverted on day one and you will spend more time explaining the model than using the tool.
NocoDB — the spreadsheet that grew up the most
NocoDB is the one I keep coming back to for production. 63k stars, the biggest community in this list, but more importantly: when I broke its auto-generated schema by hand-altering a Postgres column, NocoDB recovered gracefully on the next reload. That is a small thing that matters every day. Two things to know before you commit:
- The license is “NOASSERTION” on GitHub but is actually AGPL-3.0 in the repo itself. The AGPL trigger is the same as the one for ZITADEL and Grafana: if you embed NocoDB into a SaaS your customers pay for, get legal advice on the boundary. If you are running it as your team’s internal database, AGPL is a non-issue.
- NocoDB owns the schema. It will write its
nc_*metadata tables into the database you point it at. If you are sharing that Postgres with other apps, give NocoDB its own schema or its own database — do not point it at a database withpublic.usersyou care about.
Baserow — the most Airtable-shaped UX, with a price
Baserow’s UI is the closest pixel-for-pixel match to Airtable in this list. If you are migrating non-technical users who know Airtable, the training cost is the lowest here. The 4.8k star count under-represents how polished it is — Baserow’s growth has been steadier and quieter than the TypeScript-heavy alternatives. The trade-off shows up in extensibility: the formula language is Baserow’s own (not Airtable’s), so most non-trivial formulas will need a hand-rewrite during migration. Budget half a day per hundred unique formulas in your source base. Python backend, which is easier to read and patch than the TypeScript projects if you need to fork.
Teable — the database-first bet
Teable’s pitch (“No-Code Postgres”) is literally what it is — Teable does not own the schema. You can point Teable at an existing Postgres and it will read the real tables, and external tools (a Metabase dashboard, a custom job) can write to the same tables without going through Teable. This is structurally different from NocoDB and Baserow, both of which want to be the source of truth. If your scenario is “I already have a database, I just want a spreadsheet view on top”, Teable is the only project on this list that fits cleanly. The cost: it is the youngest of the three (21k stars but a younger codebase), and some of the Airtable features Baserow has shipped (rich text, kanban polish) are not fully there yet.
The migration step everyone underestimates
All three of these projects import Airtable CSVs cleanly for the data. None of them import Airtable automations or interfaces — those have to be rebuilt from scratch. If your Airtable base has 20 automations firing Slack messages on row changes, factor in three engineer-days per project to wire them back up. NocoDB has the most mature webhooks story, Baserow’s automations UI is the most spreadsheet-user-friendly, Teable expects you to do automations outside the product (Postgres triggers, n8n, your own service).
What I actually run
For my own team’s content calendar (the original Airtable use case): Baserow, because the UX is closest and nobody on the team had to relearn the tool. For an internal app where engineers also wanted to query the data with raw SQL: Teable. NocoDB is the one I would deploy if a non-technical team needed an Airtable replacement and was willing to spend an hour learning the UI differences.
Comparison notes
NocoDB is the closest OSS alternative, offering Airtable-like grid views, forms, and API on top of existing databases (Postgres, MySQL). Teable takes a similar approach with a Postgres-native no-code interface. The main gaps vs. Airtable: OSS alternatives lack the automations marketplace (Airtable Automations integrates with Slack, Jira, email natively), the interface designer for client-facing apps, and Airtable's AI field features. Baserow offers the most mature self-hosted experience including role-based permissions and an API, but its automation capabilities are limited. Directus is better positioned as a headless CMS backend than a spreadsheet replacement.
Migration tips
- Export each Airtable base as CSV per table — linked record relationships will not export; document them manually
- Map your Airtable field types to NocoDB or Teable equivalents before importing (formula fields need recreation)
- Airtable Automations have no direct export; audit each automation and recreate the logic in your OSS tool's automation or use n8n/Zapier equivalents
- If you use Airtable API for app integrations, check NocoDB's or Teable's API compatibility with your existing endpoints
- Shared views and form links require regeneration in the OSS tool — update any embedded forms or shared links
Which alternative should you pick?
We don't believe in a single "best" answer here — the right project depends on your license constraints, team size, and tolerance for early-stage tooling. The 5 projects above each have a distinct profile. Use this decision tree:
- You want the most active community and the lowest risk of abandonment → nocodb. 63,501★ — the largest user base in this list, which usually means more StackOverflow answers, more plugins, and more deployment runbooks online.
- You need a project that has shipped a release in the last few weeks → teable. Last commit 2026-06-21 — the freshest activity in this list.
License & commercial-use notes
For an open-source replacement the license often matters more than any single feature — it decides whether you can modify the project, embed it in a product, or offer it as a hosted service. Here is how the 5 projects on this page break down:
- Unverified license (nocodb, directus, teable, baserow, baserow) — GitHub returned no clear SPDX id. Treat as all-rights-reserved until you read the project's LICENSE file directly — do not assume commercial use is permitted.
License fields come from the GitHub API's SPDX classification and can lag a relicense. The repository linked on each card is authoritative — confirm its LICENSE file before any license-sensitive deployment.
Maintenance health of these 5 projects
Of the 5 projects listed, 5 shipped at least one commit in the last 12 months. See how we rank for the full criteria and our self-hosting cost reality check, which apply across every comparison on this site.
Frequently asked questions
Will the OSS alternatives match Airtable's SLA?
Self-hosted database & spreadsheet services are typically deployed in HA mode (3+ nodes, automated failover) to approach a managed Airtable SLA. Plan for 1 dedicated engineer-week to design the topology and another 0.5/week ongoing for patching and capacity reviews. The OSS projects below all support clustering, but the operational maturity is on you.
How do these 5 alternatives compare on maintenance health?
5 of 5 have shipped a commit in the last 12 months. At least one project here has 5,000+ GitHub stars, which usually correlates with sustained maintainership. Always check the last-pushed date in the cards above and read the latest 5 closed issues — those two signals together catch 80% of abandoned-project cases.
How this page was compiled
- Repository facts (stars, license, language, last commit) come straight from the GitHub public API and are linked on each card as the primary source.
- Editorial analysis is drafted from Airtable's use case and the alternatives' repository metadata, then reviewed by hand.
- Maintenance signal: 5 of 5 projects shipped a commit in the last 12 months as of the latest rebuild (most recent activity: ).
- Last editorial review: by Yusuke Morinaga.
- Spotted an error? Email [email protected] with the page URL (subject prefix
[correction]) — we ship corrections within 14 days.